Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...


YearCitationKeywordsLink
12014Ricker, R., Hendricks, S., Helm, V., Skourup, H., and Davidson, M.: Sensitivity of CryoSat-2 Arctic sea-ice freeboard and thickness on radar-waveform interpretation, The Cryosphere, 8, 1607-1622, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-1607-2014, 2014. CryoSat-2The Cryosphere
22014Stroeve, J., Barrett, A., Serreze, M., and Schweiger, A.: Using records from submarine, aircraft and satellites to evaluate climate model simulations of Arctic sea ice thickness, The Cryosphere, 8, 1839-1854, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-1839-2014, 2014. CryoSat-2, model evaluationThe Cryosphere
32015Ricker, R., S. Hendricks, D. K. Perovich, V. Helm, and R. Gerdes (2015), Impact of snow accumulation on CryoSat‐2 range retrievals over Arctic sea ice: An observational approach with buoy data. Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 4447–4455. doi: 10.1002/2015GL064081.CryoSat-2, ArcticGeophysical Research Letters
342016 Schwegmann, S., Rinne, E., Ricker, R., Hendricks, S., and Helm, V.: About the consistency between Envisat and CryoSat-2 radar freeboard retrieval over Antarctic sea ice, The Cryosphere, 10, 1415-1425, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-1415-2016, 2016. CryoSat-2, Envisat, AntarcticThe Cryosphere
452017Ricker, R., S. Hendricks, F. Girard‐Ardhuin, L. Kaleschke, C. Lique, X. Tian‐Kunze, M. Nicolaus, and T. Krumpen (2017), Satellite‐observed drop of Arctic sea ice growth in winter 2015–2016, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 3236–3245, doi:10.1002/2016GL072244.CryoSat-2, SMOS, ArcticGeophysical Research Letters
562017Ricker, R., Hendricks, S., Kaleschke, L., Tian-Kunze, X., King, J., and Haas, C.: A weekly Arctic sea-ice thickness data record from merged CryoSat-2 and SMOS satellite data, The Cryosphere, 11, 1607-1623, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-1607-2017, 2017CryoSat-2, SMOS, ArcticThe Cryosphere
672017Skourup, H., Farrell, S. L., Hendricks, S., Ricker, R., Armitage, T. W. K., Ridout, A., … Baker, S. (2017). An assessment of state‐of‐the‐art mean sea surface and geoid models of the Arctic Ocean: Implications for sea ice freeboard retrieval. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 122, 8593–8613. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JC013176CryoSat-2, ArcticJournal of Geophysical Research - Oceans
782017Nandan, V., Geldsetzer, T., Yackel, J., Mahmud, M., Scharien, R., Howell, S., King, S., Ricker, R., Else, B. (2017). Effect of snow salinity on CryoSat‐2 Arctic first‐year sea ice freeboard measurements. Geophysical Research Letters, 44, 10,419–10,426. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074506CryoSat-2, ArcticGeophysical Research Letters
892017Haas, C., Beckers, J., King, J., Silis, A., Stroeve, J., Wilkinson, J., Notenboom, B., Schweiger, A., & Hendricks, S. (2017). Ice and snow thickness variability and change in the high Arctic Ocean observed by in situ measurements. Geophysical Research Letters, 44, 10,462–10,469. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL075434CryoSat-2, ArcticGeophysical Research Letters
9102018Mu, L. , Yang, Q. , Losch, M. , Losa, S. N., Ricker, R. , Nerger, L. and Liang, X. (2018), Improving sea ice thickness estimates by assimilating CryoSat‐2 and SMOS sea ice thickness data simultaneously. Q.J.R. Meteorol. Soc., 144: 529-538. doi:10.1002/qj.3225CryoSat-2, SMOS, Assimilation, ArcticRMetS
1011